• Home
  • About Rimag
  • Contact Us
  • Register
  • Log in
  • Order
Advanced
  • Home
  •  
  • Current Issue

    41
    Issue 41   Vol 11 Winter 2023
    Submit Your Paper List of Journal Reviewers

    Published Issues

    • Vol. 11
      • ✓ Issue 41 - Winter 2023
    • Vol. 10
      • ✓ Issue 40 - Autumn 2022
      • ✓ Issue 39 - Summer 2022
      • ✓ Issue 38 - Spring 2022
      • ✓ Issue 37 - Winter 2022
    • Vol. 9
      • ✓ Issue 36 - Autumn 2021
      • ✓ Special Issue
      • ✓ Issue 35 - Summer 2021
      • ✓ Issue 34 - Spring 2021
      • ✓ Issue 33 - Winter 2021
    • Vol. 8
      • ✓ Issue 32 - Autumn 2020
      • ✓ Issue 31 - Summer 2020
      • ✓ Issue 30 - Spring 2020
      • ✓ Issue 29 - Winter 2020
    • Vol. 7
      • ✓ Issue 28 - Autumn 2019
      • ✓ Issue 27 - Summer 2019
      • ✓ Issue 26 - Spring 2019
      • ✓ Issue 25 - Winter 2019
    • Vol. 6
      • ✓ Issue 24 - Autumn 2018
      • ✓ Issue 23 - Summer 2018
      • ✓ Issue 22 - Spring 2018
      • ✓ Issue 21 - Winter 2018
    • Vol. 5
      • ✓ Issue 20 - Autumn 2017
      • ✓ Issue 19 - Summer 2017
      • ✓ Issue 18 - Spring 2017
      • ✓ Issue 17 - Winter 2017
    • Vol. 4
      • ✓ Issue 16 - Autumn 2016
      • ✓ Issue 15 - Summer 2016
      • ✓ Issue 14 - Spring 2016
      • ✓ Issue 13 - Winter 2016
    • Vol. 3
      • ✓ Issue 12 - Autumn 2015
      • ✓ Issue 11 - Summer 2015
      • ✓ Issue 10 - Spring 2015
      • ✓ Issue 9 - Winter 2015
    • Vol. 2
      • ✓ Issue 8 - Autumn 2014
      • ✓ Issue 7 - Summer 2014
      • ✓ Issue 6 - Spring 2014
      • ✓ Issue 5 - Winter 2014
    • Vol. 1
      • ✓ Issue 4 - Autumn 2013
      • ✓ Issue 3 - Summer 2013
      • ✓ Issue 2 - Spring 2013
      • ✓ Issue 1 - Winter 2013

    Browse

    • •  Current Issue
    • •  By Issue
    • • Author Index
    • •  By Subject
    • •  By Author

    Menu

    • •  Editorial Board
    • •  Journal Policy
    • •  About Journal
    • •  Special Issues
    • •  Author Guide
    • •  Article Processing Charges (APC)
    • •  Evaluation Process
    • Contact Journal
    OpenAccess
    • List of Articles  

      • Open Access Article
        • Abstract Page
        • Full-Text

        1 - Developing A Contextual Combinational Approach for Predictive Analysis of Users Mobile Phone Trajectory Data in LBSNs
        Fatemeh  Ghanaati Gholamhossein Ekbatanifard Kamrad Khoshhal Roudposhti
        10.52547/jist.32593.11.41.12
        Today, smartphones, due to their ubiquity, have become indispensable in human daily life. Progress in the technology of mobile phones has recently resulted in the emergence of several popular services such as location-based social networks (LBSNs) and predicting the nex More
        Today, smartphones, due to their ubiquity, have become indispensable in human daily life. Progress in the technology of mobile phones has recently resulted in the emergence of several popular services such as location-based social networks (LBSNs) and predicting the next Point of Interest (POI), which is an important task in these services. The gathered trajectory data in LBSNs include various contextual information such as geographical and temporal contextual information (GTCI) that play a crucial role in the next POI recommendations. Various methods, including collaborating filtering (CF) and recurrent neural networks, incorporated the contextual information of the user’ trajectory data to predict the next POIs. CF methods do not consider the effect of sequential data on modeling, while the next POI prediction problem is inherently a time sequence problem. Although recurrent models have been proposed for sequential data modeling, they have limitations such as similarly considering the effect of contextual information. Nonetheless, they have a separate impact as well. In the current study, a geographical temporal contextual information-extended attention gated recurrent unit (GTCI-EAGRU) architecture was proposed to separately consider the influence of geographical and temporal contextual information on the next POI recommendations. In this research, the GRU model was developed using three separate attention gates to consider the contextual information of the user trajectory data in the recurrent layer GTCI-EAGRU architecture, including timestamp, geographical, and temporal contextual attention gates. Inspired by the assumption of the matrix factorization method in CF approaches, a ranked list of POI recommendations was provided for each user. Moreover, a comprehensive evaluation was conducted by utilizing large-scale real-world datasets based on three LBSNs, including Gowalla, Brightkite, and Foursquare. The results revealed that the performance of GTCI-EAGRU was higher than that of competitive baseline methods in terms of Acc@10, on average, by 42.11% in three datasets. Manuscript profile
  • Home Page
  • Site Map
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • Site Map
  • Regional Science and Technology Information Center
  • Contact Us

The rights to this website are owned by the Raimag Press Management System.
Copyright © 2017-2023

Home| Login| About Rimag| Contact Us|
[فارسی] [العربية] [fa] [ar]
  • Ricest
  • Login
  • email